II PK 76/07
Generato dall'IA
Civil court ruled mandatory newspaper apology for workplace harassment is disproportionate and violates personal rights.
Polonia (PL)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court partially dismissed the plaintiff's claim for a newspaper apology after finding the lower court's order disproportionate. The plaintiff alleged workplace harassment caused health issues, while the defendant argued for a public apology. The court held that since the harassment was known only to a narrow group of employees, a newspaper publication was excessive and violated the plaintiff's personal rights.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 24 § 1 k.c.; The obligation to publish an apology must be proportional to the scope of the violated personal interest, and public media publication is inappropriate when the harm was confined to a limited circle of employees.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
proportionality principle
personal rights protection
workplace harassment
reparations for harm
public apology
civil liability
disproportionate remedy
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 24 § 1 k.c.
Art. 112 k.p.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 448 k.c.
Art. 445 § 1 k.c.
art. 24 § 1 k.c
art. 94 k.p
art. 112 k.p
art. 300 k.p
art. 448 k.c
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IAI CK 754/04
I CKN 1391/00
I PK 169/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling discrimination claims invalid due to procedural errors and temporal gaps in mobbing laws.
II CSK 132/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to appellate court's failure to address substantive tax liability arguments.
III CSK 5/05
Supreme Court vacates eviction order, holding construction contributions are not legal retention claims under Civil Code.
IV CK 526/04
Supreme Court quashes civil judgment due to procedural errors regarding municipal financial obligations and commercial activity limits.
IV CK 413/04
Supreme Court quashes appeal verdict regarding defamation claims and reorders retrial on specific facts.
II PK 152/04
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; disciplinary proceedings initiation does not automatically violate personal rights.