Court allows appeal on costs ruling but dismisses appeal on correction of judgment as inadmissible.

The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, overturning the lower court's rejection of the employer's appeal regarding court fees. The employer argued that the single judgment actually covered two distinct lawsuits, requiring separate fee payments, while the lower court had incorrectly treated it as one appeal. The court agreed, ruling that reciprocal claims create two independent proceedings subject to separate fee obligations. Conversely, the court dismissed the portion of the appeal challenging the correction of the first-instance judgment, deeming such a correction inadmissible for appeal.