Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I UZ 38/06 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows retrial when new evidence was available but not used due to opposing court's contradictory assessment.

Numero d'incarto I UZ 38/06
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted a retrial order against the Social Insurance Institution regarding the applicant's teacher pension eligibility. The applicant failed to present new evidence during the final appeal because the lower court had already established the relevant employment facts based on her testimony. The court ruled that the inability to introduce evidence stems from the opposing court's contradictory evaluation of existing proof, not from the applicant's negligence or lack of diligence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; A retrial is admissible for new evidence only if the party objectively had the ability to present it in the final proceedings, and the failure to do so was not due to negligence, forgetfulness, or a mistaken assessment of necessity, but rather because the opposing court's decision contradicted the established facts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
retrial procedure new evidence admissibility social insurance pension teacher employment status procedural necessity contradictory court assessment duty of diligence

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 403 § 2 k.p.c
art. 299 k.p.c
art. 410 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
II CKN 807/98
I ACa 789/05

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo