Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UK 61/05 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows pension claim review when new medical evidence changes factual basis despite prior final judgment.

Numero d'incarto II UK 61/05
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's dismissal of a pension claim based on the principle of res judicata. The lower court incorrectly applied this principle to a new application filed years later with fresh medical evidence proving a link between the applicant's disability and military service. The court ruled that since the right to a pension is not time-limited, the factual basis changed, allowing the case to be re-examined on its merits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 366 k.p.c.; Art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The principle of res judicata applies only when the factual basis of a social insurance court's decision cannot be changed; if new facts or evidence alter the factual basis, the case may be re-examined.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
res judicata principle social insurance pension military service disability new medical evidence factual basis change time-limited right appellate review

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 366 k.p.c.
art. 386 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
art. 7 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 2 września 1994 r. o świadczeniu pieniężnym i uprawnieniach przysługujących żołnierzom zastępczej służby wojskowej
art. 83 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 3 k.p.c
art. 39313 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo