Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PK 61/05 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling termination justified by employee's poor availability and production disruption.

Numero d'incarto I PK 61/05
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor court judgment that rejected her request to be reinstated to work. The plaintiff, a long-term employee, had been repeatedly absent due to illness and childcare, causing significant production disorganization for her team. The court held that the employer's termination was justified because the employee's lack of availability prevented her from fulfilling her duties, and no prior offer of alternative work was legally required. Consequently, the court found no violation of the Labor Code or social norms, upholding the employer's right to terminate the contract.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 45 § 1 k.p.; Art. 8 k.p.: The employer may terminate the employment contract for reasons concerning the employee or other non-employee factors, and justification is established if at least one reason is valid; prior offer of alternative work is not a prerequisite for lawful termination.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
termination of employment contract employee unavailability production disruption Labor Code provisions social norms violation cassation appeal dismissal alternative work offer

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 45 § 1 k.p.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
art. 45 k.p
art. 8 k.p
art. 45 § 1 k.p
art. 39311 k.p.c
art. 39312 k.p.c
art. 102 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo