I PZ 72/02 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court held monthly appeal deadlines follow continuous calculation rules, dismissing the appeal as inadmissible.

Numero d'incarto I PZ 72/02

Autorità giudiziaria Sąd Najwyższy

Giurisdizione

Polonia (PL)

Data della decisione 2002-08-23

Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's protest against the appellate court's rejection of their appeal. The appellant argued that monthly deadlines should be calculated differently for February compared to other months, citing prior rulings. The court ruled that the continuous calculation method under the Civil Code applies uniformly and that the lack of specific grounds for appeal review rendered the protest inadmissible.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 3934 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 112 k.c.; Art. 165 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 3933 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.; Monthly appeal deadlines are calculated continuously using the Civil Code rules, and appeals lacking specific grounds for review are inadmissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

continuous time limit monthly appeal deadline Civil Code calculation inadmissible appeal procedural requirements

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 3934 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 112 k.c.

Art. 165 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 3933 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.

Art. 385 k.p.c.

Art. 39318 § 3 k.p.c.

Art. 397 § 2 k.p.c.

Art. 98 § 1 k.p.c.

art. 3934 § 1 k.p.c

art. 112 k.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

postanowienie z dnia 6 sierpnia 1997 r., II UZ 53/97

postanowienie z dnia 11 sierpnia 1999 r., I CZ 106/99

postanowienie z dnia 11 grudnia 1996 r., I PKN 45/96

postanowienie z dnia 22 marca 2001 r., V CZ 131/01

postanowienie z dnia 12 grudnia 2000 r., V CKN 1780/00

postanowienie z dnia 10 maja 2001 r., II CZ 35/01

postanowienie z dnia 11 maja 2001 r., III CZ 28/01

postanowienie z dnia 30 maja 2001 r., III CZ 36/01

postanowienie z dnia 17 października 2001 r., III CZ 98/01

postanowienie z dnia 27 listopada 2001 r., III CKN 462/01

postanowienie z dnia 9 listopada 2000 r., II CKN 1385/00

Constitutional Court declares cooperative housing law articles unconstitutional for restricting member rental rights.

Constitutional Court declares military support law provision requiring pre-service cohabitation unconstitutional due to equality and social aid violations.

Constitutional court upholds 5-year tobacco farmer acquisition rule as constitutionally equal treatment under social justice.

Constitutional court strikes down retail drug margin rules for lack of transitional protection under Art. 22.1.1.1. of the Constitution.

Testo completo