Supreme Court dismissed appeal; non-free shares deprivation is damage regardless of market purchase or sale restrictions.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Zbigniew P. against the Bank P. SA Group. The plaintiff argued that depriving him of free shares constituted damage under the Civil Code, regardless of whether he bought them on the market or faced trading restrictions. The court held that while the lower court's reasoning on damage was flawed, the final decision was correct because the bank's refusal to count prior employment was lawful. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the plaintiff was not ordered to pay costs.