Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UZ 113/00 Generato dall'IA

Polish Supreme Court dismisses appeal where late lawyer appointment does not reset filing deadlines due to client negligence.

Numero d'incarto II UZ 113/00
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a second-instance court's rejection of her request to reinstate the cassation deadline. The appellant had been properly notified of the deadline but failed to file a lawyer or request an extension until three days before expiration. The court ruled that merely appointing a lawyer late does not reopen the filing period because the delay was caused by the appellant's own unjustified inactivity.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 168 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 19 KPC: The appointment of a lawyer ex officio filed shortly before a deadline expires does not constitute a valid ground for reinstating the missed filing period if the delay was caused by the party's own unjustified inactivity.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
reinstatement of deadline inactivity of the party appointment of lawyer ex officio cassation procedure fault of the party

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 168 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 19 KPC
Art. 385 KPC

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
II CKN 724/99

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo