Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UKN 21/99 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on occupational disability pension due to medical improvement and lack of procedural guidance violation.

Numero d'incarto II UKN 21/99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Mark W. against a decision denying his occupational disability pension. The lower courts found that the applicant's occupational asthma no longer caused respiratory insufficiency or disability, and his knee issues were unrelated to his work injury. The court ruled that the applicant did not require specific procedural guidance regarding new expert opinions because the medical evidence already conclusively established the absence of occupational disability.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 5 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: The obligation to provide necessary procedural guidance applies only when a party without legal representation would be deprived of influence on the process; the court is not required to inform parties about evidence not essential to the established facts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
occupational disability pension medical improvement procedural guidance expert opinion evidence cassation appeal dismissal

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 5 KPC
Art. 78 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 87 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 18 of the Act on Occupational Injuries and Diseases
Art. 393 § 1 KPC

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo