Fake employment contract for social benefits dismissed; actual work required for child allowance rights.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a decision denying a child allowance to a woman who had signed a fake employment contract. The Social Insurance Office argued the contract was fictitious because the applicant did not perform work, citing her subsequent sick leave and inability to work as a bookkeeper. The court ruled that merely signing a contract without the intent to work or actual employment does not grant social benefits, as the law requires proof of a six-month employment period.