Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UKN 183/98 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for evidence introduced late without prior necessity, upholding Art. 381 KPC application.

Numero d'incarto II UKN 183/98
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court's refusal to admit new medical evidence presented for the first time in the second instance. The appellant argued that the need for this specific hospital record arose only after the first trial, but the court found the necessity existed earlier when the appellant cited other hospital treatments. Consequently, the court ruled that the lower court correctly applied Article 381 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which limits new evidence to cases where prior necessity was absent.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 381 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC: The second instance court may admit evidence introduced for the first time only if the need for it did not exist in the first instance proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
evidence admissibility second instance procedure late evidence introduction civil procedure code cassation appeal dismissal medical record evidence procedural necessity

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 381 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 217 § 1 KPC

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo