Supreme Court dismisses appeal when employment contract features lack subordination, favoring civil contract terms.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Grzegorz A. against Hubert N., rejecting the claim of an employment relationship. The lower court found that while the plaintiff performed various tasks, he lacked subordination as he organized his own work, time, and tools without fixed hours or attendance records. The court ruled that in the absence of dominant employment characteristics, the formal name and execution of the civil contract determine the legal relationship.