Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PKN 234/98 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation where missing evidence citation did not justify overturning a labor court verdict.

Numero d'incarto I PKN 234/98
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a labor court decision terminating his employment. The employee argued that the lower courts failed to cite specific evidence for their factual findings regarding his substitution of a fire extinguisher. The court ruled that such a procedural omission does not automatically constitute grounds for cassation unless it could have materially influenced the case outcome. Since the factual findings were supported by consistent witness testimony and the procedural defect had no impact on the final judgment, the appeal was rejected.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC; Art. 231 KPC; Art. 264 § 2 KP; A failure to cite specific evidence in a judgment does not justify cassation unless the omission could have materially influenced the case outcome.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
labor law cassation procedural omission evidence citation material influence termination of employment labor court verdict witness testimony

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 231 KPC
Art. 264 § 2 KP

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo