Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PZ 71/97 Generato dall'IA

Mislabeling a writ as an appeal does not bar proceedings if it could be heard in the proper manner under Polish Civil Procedure Code.

Numero d'incarto I PZ 71/97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland modified the lower court's decision to reject the appellant's appeal, ruling that the writ was procedurally invalid. The appellant had mislabeled a request for a ruling on the lack of a written judgment as a cassation appeal, which was inadmissible due to the case's value and the nature of the contested order. The court held that a clerical error in naming the writ does not prevent its processing, provided the document could be accepted under the correct procedural track.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 130 § 1 zdanie drugie KPC; Art. 392 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 KPC: A mislabeling of a procedural document as a cassation appeal does not preclude its examination if it is permissible to recognize it in the proper manner.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
mislabeling procedural document cassation appeal inadmissibility written judgment justification procedural track recognition clerical error in writ Polish Civil Procedure Code second instance decision

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 130 § 1 zdanie drugie KPC
Art. 392 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 KPC
Art. 369 § 2 KPC
Art. 393 pkt 6 KPC
Art. 393 2 KPC

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo