Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PKN 25/97 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation, upholding lower courts' finding that the employer failed to terminate the employment contract within the statutory one-month period.

Numero d'incarto I PKN 25/97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a labor court judgment ordering the reinstatement of an employee. The appellant argued that the employer incorrectly calculated the one-month notice period required for termination, claiming the clock should have started later based on new evidence. The court ruled that factual findings made during a properly conducted evidentiary procedure cannot be successfully challenged on cassation and that the employer failed to prove the notice period began after the end of November 1995.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 393 § 1 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 52 § 1, 2 KP: A cassation appeal cannot be based on questioning facts established in a properly conducted evidentiary procedure, and the statutory notice period for termination must be calculated from the date the employer became aware of the grounds for termination unless proven otherwise.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
labor law termination statutory notice period cassation appeal dismissal evidentiary procedure employment contract validity

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 52 § 1 KP
Art. 52 § 2 KP
Art. 393 § 2 KPC

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo