II URN 36/96
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court quashes social security court verdict for denying child support due to procedural invalidity from lack of defendant summons.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's verdict denying child support payments due to a procedural violation where the defendant was not summoned to participate. The defendant, Waldemar M., had not been notified of the proceedings before the social security organ, violating the requirement for his participation under the Civil Procedure Code. Consequently, the court declared the proceedings void for depriving the defendant of the right to defense and remanded the case for a new trial.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 477 11 § 2 KPC; Art. 369 pkt 5 KPC: Proceedings conducted without summoning an interested party who did not participate before the social security organ are void as they deprive the party of the right to defense.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
procedural invalidity
summons requirement
right to defense
social security proceedings
child support enforcement
void proceedings
remand for retrial
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAart. 477 11 § 2 KPC
art. 369 pkt 5 KPC
art. 154 § 1 i 2 KPA
art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 18 lipca 1974 r. o funduszu alimentacyjnym
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IAII CR 155/75 - OSPiKA 1975 z. 3 s. 66