Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II URN 36/96 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court quashes social security court verdict for denying child support due to procedural invalidity from lack of defendant summons.

Numero d'incarto II URN 36/96
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's verdict denying child support payments due to a procedural violation where the defendant was not summoned to participate. The defendant, Waldemar M., had not been notified of the proceedings before the social security organ, violating the requirement for his participation under the Civil Procedure Code. Consequently, the court declared the proceedings void for depriving the defendant of the right to defense and remanded the case for a new trial.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 477 11 § 2 KPC; Art. 369 pkt 5 KPC: Proceedings conducted without summoning an interested party who did not participate before the social security organ are void as they deprive the party of the right to defense.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedural invalidity summons requirement right to defense social security proceedings child support enforcement void proceedings remand for retrial

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 477 11 § 2 KPC
art. 369 pkt 5 KPC
art. 154 § 1 i 2 KPA
art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 18 lipca 1974 r. o funduszu alimentacyjnym

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
II CR 155/75 - OSPiKA 1975 z. 3 s. 66

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo