Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PRN 33/95 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court ruled that a journalist's special retirement age does not count as normal retirement age for dismissal purposes.

Numero d'incarto I PRN 33/95
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the extraordinary revision filed by the Minister of Justice against a labor court decision. The court found that the plaintiff, a journalist, was dismissed upon reaching a special early retirement age defined in a specific regulation, which differs from the standard retirement age applicable to journalists under the Labor Code. Consequently, the court held that this special age did not constitute the 'normal retirement age' required to justify a dismissal under the relevant articles of the Labor Code.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 39 k.p.; Art. 40 § 2 k.p.; Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 lutego 1983 r. The concept of 'normal retirement age' in the Labor Code excludes the special early retirement age granted to journalists under specific regulations, as it pertains only to the standard age defined in general pension laws.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Labor Code retirement age journalist dismissal special pension extraordinary revision labor relations early retirement

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 39 k.p.
Art. 40 § 2 k.p.
§ 13 of the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 7 February 1983 on retirement age
Art. 55 of the Act of 14 December 1982 on pension provision
Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 40 § 2 k.p
art. 45 k.p
art. 39 k.p
art. 422 § 1 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
I PZP 14/76
I PZP 65/92

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo