II PK 342/09 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses union leader's claim to determine unpaid leave rights due to lack of legal interest.

Numero d'incarto II PK 342/09

Autorità giudiziaria Sąd Najwyższy

Giurisdizione

Polonia (PL)

Data della decisione 2010-04-07

Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the union leader's appeal to determine his right to paid leave from work obligations. The lower court rejected the claim because the union organization was not registered in the court registry, and the leader failed to prove a specific legal interest in the declaratory relief. The court held that without a registered entity, the leader lacks standing to seek such determinations, and the burden of proving legal interest lies with the plaintiff.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 189 k.p.c.; Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych: The statutory body of a trade union organization lacks the right to claim determination of a worker's right to paid leave if the organization is not registered in the court registry, as no legal interest exists for the individual leader.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

trade union registration legal interest requirement declaratory relief dismissal union leader standing paid leave determination burden of proof plaintiff court registry entry

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 189 k.p.c.

Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych

Art. 6 k.c.

Art. 39814

Art. 39815 § 1 zdanie pierwsze

Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.

art. 189 k.p.c

art. 6 k.c

art. 39816 k.p.c

art. 39 k.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

I PKN 231/98

Employer's request for union membership count does not violate union independence or constitute discrimination.

I CKN 903/00

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against donation of expropriated land to a public utility foundation. The court finds the transfer valid as it preserves the public purpose of the original expropriation. The donation does not violate the property law regarding the use of expropriated land.

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; defective corporate organ act cannot be cured under Civil Code.

Supreme Court allows appeal against dismissal of claim to correct employment certificate under Civil Procedure Code.

Supreme Court allows action to declare work accident despite employer's lack of interest in social security benefits.

Supreme Court dismisses cassation, upholding lower court's finding of legal interest in invalidating property transfer contracts.

Third fixed-term contract before EU accession automatically converts to indefinite term regardless of subsequent law suspension.

Supreme Court allows evidence against employment certificate statements anytime, even after statute of limitations expires. The court dismissed the appeal regarding the employer's liability for the certificate period. The decision clarifies that correcting employment certificate errors is always possible regardless of procedural deadlines. The court ruled that the employer's successor liability was not established due to unresolved legal succession issues. The judgment emphasizes the distinction between proving substantive facts and correcting official documents. This case establishes that evidence against employment certificates can be introduced at any stage of proceedings. The court found the lower court's dismissal of the appeal was legally incorrect based on these principles.

Testo completo