Request to revise planning decision dismissed; minor text error does not justify overturning valid ruling.

The Council of State dismissed the applicant's request to revise a previous decision declaring a zoning plan invalid. Although the lower court omitted a specific 12-meter height allowance in its reasoning, the court found this omission did not constitute a factual error warranting revision. The court determined that a new assessment based on the correct height would yield the same outcome, confirming the original decision's validity.