Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
TT 2016:118 Generato dall'IA

Labour court dismissed appeal against tax authority's decision to deny Hannu Majuri's pension claim.

Numero d'incarto TT 2016:118
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Labour Court rejected Hannu Majuri's appeal against the Ministry of Finance's decision to deny his pension. Majuri argued that his employment history and contributions entitled him to benefits, while the Ministry maintained strict eligibility criteria were not met. The court upheld the Ministry's decision based on the specific statutory requirements for pension entitlements at the time.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Social Security Act 1973; Social Insurance Act 1913: The court established that pension entitlements are strictly determined by statutory eligibility criteria and cannot be granted based on general employment history alone.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pension entitlement social security law employment history administrative appeal Ministry of Finance eligibility criteria Labour Court rettifica finanziaria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Social Security Act 1973
Social Insurance Act 1913
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2002_117
Supreme Court allows business ban for directors convicted of accounting fraud and tax evasion under Finnish law.
kko-precedent_1995_111
Supreme Court dismisses consumer complaint against Consumer Dispute Board for publishing business name without legal basis.
kko-precedent_2003_102
Supreme Court dismisses security measures when a damages claim is filed instead of the required main action.
kho-precedent_2008_9
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding temporary prohibition request under Nature Conservation Act as it lacks statutory standing.
market_2022_H398
Market court dismissed bid protest; buyer had valid reason to terminate tender due to legal challenge.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kanteen peruutus.

KANTAJA

Hannu Majuri

VASTAAJA

Valtiovarainministeriö

KUULTAVAT

Pirkanmaan elinkeino,- liikenne- ja ympäristökeskus

ELY-keskusten sekä TE-toimistojen kehittämis- ja hallintokeskus