Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 335/2026 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court remands sale auction case for failure to notify buyer of appeal hearing opportunity.

Numero d'incarto KKO 335/2026
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of First Instance dismissed the auctioneering authority's decision to sell shares because the highest bid was below market value, but failed to schedule a hearing for the buyer. The Supreme Court held that the lower court erred by not granting the buyer an opportunity to be heard regarding the appeal. Consequently, the case was remanded to the Court of First Instance for reconsideration with proper procedural safeguards.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Ulosottolaki 1001/1971; Ulosottolaitos 1002/1971: The court must ensure the interested party has an opportunity to be heard when reviewing an auction decision, and failure to do so requires remand.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
auction sale procedure opportunity to be heard market value assessment remand for retrial auctioneering authority decision prezzo eccessivo vizio di costruzione prezzi imposti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Ulosottolaki 1001/1971
Ulosottolaitos 1002/1971

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO 2005:32
Supreme Court rules that the purchaser at a forced auction is the proper opposing party entitled to reply to the owners' appeal.
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2018_2306
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court's award of price reduction and damages for construction defects.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:20
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when defendant's personal presence is required for appeal hearing. Appeal dismissed due to procedural error in handling defendant's absence.
kko-precedent_2005_32
Supreme Court rules that the purchaser at a forced auction is the proper opposing party entitled to reply to the owners' appeal.
appeal_1982_kouvola__1987
Appeal court revoked free trial right due to lack of need and ability to pay costs.
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__2005
Appeal court dismissed request for sale and disposal ban due to lack of probable cause and risk of asset concealment.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Hovioikeus oli ulosottovelallisen valituksesta kumonnut asunto-osakkeiden myyntiä

koskevan Ulosottolaitoksen päätöksen katsoen kihlakunnanvoudin hyväksymän

korkeimman tarjouksen alittaneen selvästi käyvän hinnan paikkakunnalla.

Hovioikeus ei ollut varannut asunto-osakkeiden ostajalle tilaisuutta tulla

valituksen johdosta kuulluksi.

Korkein oikeus katsoi, että hovioikeus oli menetellyt virheellisesti, kun se ei

ollut varannut ostajalle tilaisuutta tulla kuulluksi. Asia palautettiin

hovioikeuteen uudelleen käsiteltäväksi. Ks. KKO 2005:32