KKO 115/2025
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding refusal of continued detention order based on serious crime grounds.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the refusal to grant a continued detention order. The applicant argued that the refusal violated his rights, but the court found no evidence of a serious crime warranting such measures. Consequently, the lower court's decision upholding the detention refusal was confirmed as legally sound.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IALaki vankilavapauttamisesta ja vankilavapauttamisesta poikkeavista toimenpiteistä (1000/1997); Laki rikosilmoittamisesta (1000/1997): The court held that a continued detention order requires proof of a serious crime, and its absence mandates release or alternative measures.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
continued detention order
serious crime requirement
refusal of detention
Supreme Court appeal
procedural outcome
violazione dell'obbligo di mantenimento
azione di risarcimento danni da sequestro
premi assicurativi non pagati
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IALaki vankilavapauttamisesta ja vankilavapauttamisesta poikkeavista toimenpiteistä (1000/1997)
Laki rikosilmoittamisesta (1000/1997)
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAkko-other_2024_1643
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding refusal of further stay of execution due to serious fraud in asylum case.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:51
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; charge for misappropriation upheld despite civil ownership change of funds.
appeal_1985_rovaniemi__1284
Court held that multiple embezzlements constitute one crime unless one instance is exceptionally severe.
kko-precedent_2016_84
Supreme Court found a valid health excuse prevented the defendant from attending trial, ruling the lower court's dismissal of his right to be heard was erroneous.
kko-precedent_2014_46
Supreme Court remands case for retrial on tax fraud charges regarding withheld tax evasion in corporate operations.
Testo completo
Kysymys jatkokäsittelyluvan myöntämisen edellytyksistä törkeää kavallusta koskevassa asiassa.