Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding honor insult as a condition for granting extension of detention. Appeal rejected because honor insult is not a statutory prerequisite for detention extension. Court held that detention extension relies on flight risk and danger to public safety, not honor insult.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the lower court's refusal to grant an extension of detention based on an alleged honor insult. The appellant argued that the detention extension violated their rights by relying on an honor insult rather than statutory criteria like flight risk. The court ruled that the law does not list honor insult as a condition for extending detention, and the decision was based solely on the statutory requirements of flight risk and danger to public safety.