Supreme Court allows witness testimony from lower court despite illness declaration, permitting appellate review of facts.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court of Finland allowed the use of a witness's telephone interview and preliminary report as evidence in a murder trial, despite the witness declaring illness at the hearing. The witness had previously testified in the district court, and the prosecution argued the lower court improperly excluded the evidence due to the illness declaration. The court ruled that the illness did not invalidate the prior testimony, thereby permitting the appellate court to reassess the facts based on the original record.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAEvidence Act s. 10; Criminal Procedure Code s. 10: Prior witness testimony remains admissible in appellate proceedings even if the witness declares illness at the hearing, provided the original testimony was taken lawfully and the illness does not affect the reliability of the prior statement.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Kysymys siitä, oliko käräjäoikeuden todistajan puhelinkuulustelusta tekemää tallennetta ja todistajan esitutkintakertomusta saanut käyttää todisteena hovioikeudessa tappoa koskevassa asiassa, kun todistaja oli ilmoittanut siellä sairaudestaan aiheutuvasta esteestä. Kysymys myös siitä, oliko hovioikeus saanut mainittua näyttöä hyödyntäen arvioida asiaa toisin kuin käräjäoikeus. Ks. KKO:2007:10 KKO:2018:54