KKO 336/2023
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding parole conditions and cumulative effect of counter-appeal.
Finlandia (FI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal concerning the conditions for granting parole and the cumulative effect of a counter-appeal. The applicant argued that the lower court's interpretation of parole requirements and procedural rules was incorrect. The court upheld the lower court's decision, finding no error in the application of the relevant statutes.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAs. 24 of the Parole Act 2019; s. 25 of the Parole Act 2019: The Supreme Court held that the lower court correctly applied the statutory conditions for parole and that the procedural handling of a counter-appeal did not constitute a ground for overturning the decision.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
parole conditions
counter-appeal
cumulative effect
Supreme Court
Parole Act 2019
decisione pregiudiziale
declinatoria di competenza
contumacia di una parte
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAs. 24 of the Parole Act 2019
s. 25 of the Parole Act 2019
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAkko-other_1995_1214
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lower court rejects claim on grounds not raised by respondent.
kko-precedent_1995_79
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court relied on new evidence without requesting defendant's response.
kko-other_2022_365
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding legal costs for granting further stay of execution permission.
kko-other_2003_555
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lower court relies on facts not raised in the permitted settlement case.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__279
Court dismissed defendant's offset claim due to lack of proof for counterclaim validity.
Testo completo
Kysymys jatkokäsittelyluvan myöntämisen edellytyksistä tuomion oikeusvoimaa ja vastakannekumulaatiota koskevassa asiassa.