Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to provide evidence for serious theft trial.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Court of Appeal's refusal to provide evidence for the main trial. The appellant argued that the lower court failed its duty to supply necessary proof upon request in a serious theft case. The court held that the lower court acted correctly by not being obligated to proactively provide such evidence without a specific statutory mandate.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IALaki rikosasioista 379/1994; Laki rikosasioiden käsittelyä koskevista yleisistä säännöistä 100/2011: The lower court is not obligated to proactively provide evidence for the main trial upon the respondent's request unless specifically mandated by law.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Kysymys hovioikeuden velvollisuudesta toimittaa pääkäsittely näytön vastaanottamiseksi törkeää varkautta koskevassa asiassa vastaajan sitä vaatiessa.