Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 16/2023 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows retrial when prosecution fails to file charges within one year after probation ends.

Numero d'incarto KKO 16/2023
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted the defendant a right to further proceedings based on a change of circumstances. The lower court had sentenced the defendant to imprisonment and ordered the remainder of the sentence to be executed, but the prosecution failed to file charges within the one-year period mandated after the probation period ended. Consequently, the Supreme Court ruled that the lower court must have granted the defendant permission for a retrial to address this procedural defect.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

RL 2 c luku 14 §; OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta: The prosecution must file charges within one year after the probation period ends; failure to do so requires the lower court to grant the defendant a right to further proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
probation period expiration one year filing deadline right to further proceedings procedural defect criminal prosecution timing motivazione del mutamento giurisprudenza diritto a una copertura assicurativa più estesa adeguamento della pena

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta RL 2 c luku 14 §
RL 2 c luku 14 §
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta RL 2 c luku 14 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2015_238
Supreme Court allows appeal against High Court's removal of sentence execution without prosecutor request.
appeal_1984_kouvola__1742
Court of Appeal voids execution of conditional sentence due to lack of finality in original order.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__349
Court allows partial sentence reduction to fines when reduction applies to both fines and imprisonment.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__1986
Court of Appeal reduced sentence to probation and added fine despite Supreme Court's prior conviction.
appeal_1983_helsinki__1810
Court upheld detention for recidivist sentenced to over one year under RVA 30a § 2.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli tuominnut A:n vankeusrangaistukseen ja määrännyt jäännösrangaistuksen pantavaksi täytäntöön. A vaati hovioikeudessa muun ohella, että jäännösrangaistusta ei määrätä täytäntöönpantavaksi. Oikeudenkäyntiaineistosta kävi ilmi, että syytettä ei ollut nostettu rikoslain 2 c luvun 14 §:ssä säädetyin tavoin vuoden kuluessa koeajan päättymisestä.

Korkein oikeus katsoi, että hovioikeuden olisi pitänyt myöntää A:lle jatkokäsittelylupa muutosperusteella.

OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta RL 2 c luku 14 §