Supreme Court dismissed criminal victim compensation claim due to lack of evidence proving direct causal link between crime and injury.

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the plaintiff's claim for criminal victim compensation, ruling that the evidence failed to establish a direct causal link between the alleged crime and the claimed injuries. The plaintiff argued that the defendant's actions caused the harm, but the court found no sufficient medical or factual basis to connect the specific criminal act to the injuries sustained. Consequently, the claim was rejected because the statutory requirements for compensation were not met by the presented evidence.