Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1761/2022 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows state to claim court costs when defendant fails to appear in person at main trial.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1761/2022
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed the state to claim court costs from the defendant for failing to appear in person at the main trial. The lower courts had dismissed two charges against the defendant, but the state argued that the defendant's absence at the initial hearing caused unnecessary expenses. The court ruled that the statutory obligation to appear in person remains valid even if subsequent charges are dropped, thereby justifying the cost claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

ROL 9 luku 1 a §; ROL 9 luku 9 §: The state may claim court costs for a defendant's failure to appear in person at the main trial, even if subsequent charges are dismissed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
court costs claim failure to appear main trial attendance state reimbursement criminal procedure costs deroga in caso di stato di emergenza asilo di cittadino srilankese persecuzione determinante per la fuga

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
ROL 9 luku 1 a §
ROL 9 luku 1 a § ROL 9 luku 9 § OK 21 luku 8 §
ROL 9 luku 9 §
ROL 9 luku 1 a § ROL 9 luku 9 § OK 21 luku 8 §
OK 21 luku 8 §
ROL 9 luku 1 a § ROL 9 luku 9 § OK 21 luku 8 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2004_94
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where defendant was threatened to appear personally or lose appeal, ruling procedure not erroneous.
appeal_1984_eastern-finland__1818
Court of Appeals dismissed fine for failure to attend trial after judge already ruled and convicted defendant.
kko-precedent_2015_15
Supreme Court reverses appeal dismissal for failure to hold oral hearing on sentencing and guilt issues.
kko-precedent_2006_89
Supreme Court dismisses claim for state-funded travel costs for co-defendants summoned personally in criminal proceedings.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:47
Supreme Court allows appeal against dismissal of appeal due to absence, ruling it not a waiver of appeal rights.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus velvoitti A:n saapumaan rikosasian pääkäsittelyyn henkilökohtaisesti sakon uhalla. Käräjäoikeus hyväksyi toisen syytteen ja hylkäsi toisen. A:n valituksesta hovioikeus hylkäsi vielä toisen syytteen. Koska syytteet oli hylätty, valtio oli A:n vaatimuksesta velvollinen korvaamaan hänelle oikeudenkäyntikuluina käräjäoikeuden pääkäsittelyyn saapumisesta aiheutuneet kulut.

ROL 9 luku 1 a § ROL 9 luku 9 § OK 21 luku 8 §