Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 153/2022 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows retrial for additional sentence when original prison term is insufficient for new crime.

Numero d'incarto KKO 153/2022
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted the applicant a retrial regarding the imposition of an additional penalty for a new crime committed before the original sentence. The applicant argued that the initial 50-day prison term was adequate for the subsequent concealment offense, while the lower court imposed a fine instead. The court ruled that the appellate court failed to recognize the need for a new sentencing hearing to determine if the original term sufficed for the new offense.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki rikosprosessin järjestämisestä 391/1998, 101 §; Laki rikosprosessin järjestämisestä 391/1998, 102 §: When a new crime is committed before the execution of a sentence, the court must assess whether the original penalty is sufficient; if not, a retrial for additional sentencing is required.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
additional penalty new crime prison term sufficiency retrial for sentencing concealment offense procedural remedy Supreme Court ruling pena pecuniaria sospesa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki rikosprosessin järjestämisestä 391/1998, 101 §
Laki rikosprosessin järjestämisestä 391/1998, 102 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_1996_395
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditional sentence for serious concealment crime and other offenses.
kko-precedent_1993_140
Supreme Court allows probation for defendant P but mandates immediate execution for defendant S due to conduct during trial.
kko-other_2014_1709
Supreme Court allows appeal against sentence conversion for community service to imprisonment due to serious breach of duties.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2024:30
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; prior suspended sentence cannot excuse later crimes or prevent conviction.
kko-precedent_2007_94
Supreme Court held that prior community service sentences do not require conversion to prison for a new prison term.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli tuomittu 50 päivän ehdottomaan vankeusrangaistukseen. Tämän jälkeen häntä syytettiin hänen ennen vankeusrangaistuksen tuomitsemista tekemästään kätkemisrikoksesta. Käräjäoikeus tuomitsi hänet siitä 30 päiväsakon suuruiseen sakkorangaistukseen. A valitti hovioikeuteen ja vaati muun ohella, että vankeusrangaistus katsotaan riittäväksi seuraamukseksi myös kätkemisrikoksesta. Korkein oikeus katsoi, että hovioikeuden olisi tullut myöntää A:lle jatkokäsittelylupa rangaistuksen määräämisen osalta.