Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO 1076/2022 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows lawyer's fee claim for travel time and expenses in appeal proceedings.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1076/2022
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed a lawyer's fee claim for travel time and expenses incurred during appeal proceedings, overturning the lower court's dismissal. The lawyer had been appointed to assist a client receiving legal aid but had not generally handled cases in the specific district court, leading to a dispute over reimbursement. The court ruled that the lower court erred by failing to grant a continuation of proceedings permit based on the grounds for modification and preliminary ruling, thereby necessitating the payment of the claimed fees.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta; OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 3 kohta; OikeusapuL 17 § 1 mom: The court must grant a continuation of proceedings permit on grounds for modification or preliminary ruling when a lawyer's fee claim for travel time and expenses is substantiated, ensuring proper compensation for legal aid recipients' representation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legal aid lawyer fees travel time compensation continuation of proceedings permit modification grounds preliminary ruling Supreme Court of Finland legal aid legislation compensazione ed assistenza ai passeggeri

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 3 kohta
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 3 kohta
OikeusapuL 17 § 1 mom
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Oikeusapua saavan syytetyn avustajaksi oli määrätty asianajaja A, joka ei yleisesti hoitanut asianajotehtäviä kyseisessä käräjäoikeudessa. A oli vaatinut palkkiota muun ohella pääkäsittelyyn saapumiseen kuluneelta matka-ajalta sekä korvausta matkakuluista. Käräjäoikeus oli hylännyt nämä vaatimukset kokonaisuudessaan.

Korkein oikeus katsoi ratkaisustaan ilmenevillä perusteilla, että hovioikeuden olisi pitänyt myöntää A:lle jatkokäsittelylupa muutos- ja ennakkoratkaisuperusteella.

OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta

OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 3 kohta

OikeusapuL 17 § 1 mom