Supreme Court allows continued proceedings for sexual abuse case where initial application was rejected due to procedural errors.

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the application for continued proceedings regarding the grant of a further application for leave to appeal in a sexual abuse case. The applicant argued that the lower court's rejection was based on procedural flaws rather than the merits of the sexual abuse allegations. The court decided to reinstate the proceedings because the initial decision failed to properly address the substantive requirements for granting leave to appeal in sexual abuse matters.