Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 631/2021 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses prosecution for negligence against court officials where prosecution statute of limitations had expired.

Numero d'incarto KKO 631/2021
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the prosecution against a court clerk, judge, and jurors for negligent breach of official duty. The prosecution was filed after the statute of limitations for criminal proceedings had expired, rendering the case procedurally time-barred. Consequently, the court ruled that no criminal liability could be established due to the lapse of the limitation period.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 10 of the Act on the Statute of Limitations for Criminal Proceedings; the prosecution is inadmissible if the limitation period for criminal proceedings has expired.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
statute of limitations criminal proceedings negligent breach of duty court officials prosecution inadmissibility dubbio circa il carattere di infrazione causalità dell'infortunio motivi medici

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 10 of the Act on the Statute of Limitations for Criminal Proceedings
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2006_33
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; individual acts are not one crime due to lack of continuous intent.
kko-precedent_2005_19
Civil claim dismissed in criminal proceedings due to procedural rules on incidental civil matters.
kko-other_2019_1430
Supreme Court allows parole application where fraud conviction does not preclude release due to changed circumstances.
kko-precedent_2006_50
Supreme Court dismisses prosecution for negligence when defendant's presence is legally required for trial.
kko-precedent_2008_65
Supreme Court allows prosecution for breach of duty by university professor, splitting timeline based on statute of limitations.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäsihteeri oli antanut virheellisellä tavalla haasteen tiedoksi rikosasian vastaajalle, ja syyteoikeus oli vanhentunut. Kysymys siitä, olivatko käräjätuomari, käräjäsihteeri ja lautamiehet syyllistyneet tuottamukselliseen virkavelvollisuuden rikkomiseen.