Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 277/2021 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court refused ruling on security measure appeal because main case judgment already ordered seizure.

Numero d'incarto KKO 277/2021
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court declined to issue a ruling on the appeal regarding the security measure because the main damages case had already resulted in a judgment ordering the seizure. The lower court's decision to seize assets was primarily based on this final judgment, rendering the separate security measure appeal moot. Consequently, the court determined that no further ruling was necessary as the underlying legal basis for the seizure was already established.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 33 of the Code of Judicial Procedure; When the main case judgment already orders the seizure, the court does not issue a ruling on the appeal regarding the security measure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
security measure appeal main case judgment seizure order mootness principle Code of Judicial Procedure diritto a una copertura assicurativa più estesa tutela dei diritti quesiti adattamento delle prestazioni d'assicurazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 33 of the Code of Judicial Procedure

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO:1996:122
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against seizure order finalized in main criminal trial judgment.
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2000_1350
Supreme Court allows appeal against decision to grant security for spouse's property separation settlement request.
kko-precedent_1996_122
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against seizure order finalized in main criminal trial judgment.
kko-precedent_2001_8
Supreme Court allows appeal against seizure order extension when seizure validity remains unfinally decided.
kko-precedent_2002_22
Supreme Court requires leave to appeal for seizure of property decisions made as first instance.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:41
Supreme Court dismisses security claim because plaintiff failed to prove likelihood of obtaining damages from defendant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

B Oy:n hakemuksesta A Oy:n omaisuutta oli määrätty pantavaksi takavarikkoon B Oy:n vahingonkorvaussaamisen turvaamiseksi. Turvaamistoimiasiaa koskevan muutoksenhaun ollessa vireillä Korkeimmassa oikeudessa käräjäoikeus antoi vahingonkorvausasiassa tuomion, jossa määrättiin myös takavarikosta. Koska takavarikko nyttemmin perustui pääasiassa annettuun käräjäoikeuden tuomioon, Korkein oikeus ei antanut lausuntoa turvaamistoimipäätöstä koskevasta muutoksenhakemuksesta. Ks. KKO:1996:122