Supreme Court dismisses appeal when new primary decision on visitation rights supersedes prior ruling.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's decision regarding the implementation of a child's visitation rights. The appellant argued for the enforcement of an earlier visitation order, but the court noted that a new primary decision had already been issued to establish the current rights. Consequently, the court held that the new decision superseded the previous one, rendering the appeal moot.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IALaki lapsen oikeudesta ja velvollisuuksista (1995/1996) 10 §; Laki perheoikeudenkäyntimenettelystä (1995/1996) 10 §: When a new primary decision on visitation rights is issued, it supersedes any prior ruling, and appeals against the old decision are dismissed as the matter has been resolved.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Lausunnon antaminen lapsen tapaamisoikeuden täytäntöönpanosta raukesi sen jälkeen, kun tapaamisoikeudesta oli annettu uusi perustepäätös.