Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 939/2020 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal for retrial when lower court wrongly denies it in criminal case.

Numero d'incarto KKO 939/2020
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted the applicant's request for a retrial after the Court of Appeal incorrectly refused it. The lower court had convicted the defendant of assault based on the prosecutor's claim, but failed to properly consider the applicant's grounds for a new trial. The court ruled that the refusal violated the applicant's right to have their appeal fully examined, necessitating a retrial.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10 a §; Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10 b §: The Supreme Court must grant a retrial when a lower court improperly denies an applicant's request for a new trial without sufficient justification.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal procedure retrial request Court of Appeal procedural error appeal rights Supreme Court conviction infrazione privilegiata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10 a §
Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10 b §
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2014_25
Supreme Court quashes lower court verdict due to denial of defense preparation time and lack of legal aid.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__766
Court upheld conviction for aggravated assault, rejecting reformatio in peius request despite new evidence of life-threatening injury.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__349
Court allows partial sentence reduction to fines when reduction applies to both fines and imprisonment.
appeal_1983_helsinki__1608
Court of Appeal may add qualifying circumstances to a convicted person's decision based solely on their appeal if evidence supports it.
kko-other_2011_1746
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to transfer robbery case to main hearing.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli tuominnut vastaajan vammantuottamuksesta syyttäjän ajaman pahoinpitelyä koskevan rangaistusvaatimuksen perusteella. Kysymys siitä, olisiko hovioikeuden tullut myöntää muutosta hakeneelle vastaajalle jatkokäsittelylupa.