Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 851/2020 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal when electronic system records longer sentence than court judgment.

Numero d'incarto KKO 851/2020
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal regarding the discrepancy between the court's judgment and the electronic system's record. The lower court sentenced the defendant to nine months imprisonment, but the digital system erroneously recorded eleven months. The Court held that the official judgment prevails over the system error, and the appeal must be based on the correct nine-month term.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 1000.10 of the Code of Judicial Administration; s. 1000.11 of the Code of Judicial Administration: The official court judgment determines the sentence, and errors in the electronic system do not alter the legal outcome of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
electronic sentencing system judgment record discrepancy appeal procedure imprisonment term data entry error carenze sistemiche vizio di procedura sviamento della giustizia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 1000.10 of the Code of Judicial Administration
s. 1000.11 of the Code of Judicial Administration
Generato dall'IA
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__349
Court allows partial sentence reduction to fines when reduction applies to both fines and imprisonment.
appeal_1983_helsinki__1810
Court upheld detention for recidivist sentenced to over one year under RVA 30a § 2.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:43
Supreme Court allows extending a suspended sentence when prior total sentences cannot reduce it under the law.
kko-other_2014_1416
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where prior sentence was conditional, negating its role as a mitigating factor for new crime.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__1986
Court of Appeal reduced sentence to probation and added fine despite Supreme Court's prior conviction.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeuden kansliasta asianosaisille oli annettu tuomio, jonka mukaan vastaajalle oli tuomittu rangaistukseksi 9 kuukautta vankeutta. Vain vastaaja oli valittanut tuomiosta hovioikeuteen. Sähköiseen rikostuomiojärjestelmään käräjäoikeuden tuomitsemaksi seuraamukseksi oli tallennettu 11 kuukautta vankeutta. Hovioikeus pysytti käräjäoikeuden tuomion lopputuloksen sellaisena kuin se oli tallennettuna tuomiojärjestelmään. Kysymys A:lle tuomitun vankeusrangaistuksen pituudesta.