Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1567/2020 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding apartment company resolution invalidity affecting continued residence permit conditions.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1567/2020
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of an apartment company's resolution concerning the applicant's continued residence permit. The applicant argued the resolution was flawed, but the court found no grounds to overturn the decision based on the presented facts. Consequently, the resolution remained valid, and the conditions for the residence permit were upheld as legally sound.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki asuinpaikan muuttamisesta (1069/1991); Laki ulkomaalaisten asuminen (404/1994): The court held that an apartment company's resolution regarding residence permit conditions is valid unless proven legally flawed, and procedural errors do not automatically invalidate the decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
residence permit conditions apartment company resolution procedural validity continued residence administrative appeal difetto di legittimazione dell'azionista azione diretta all'esclusione dalla comunione dei comproprietari insufficienza del pegno

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki asuinpaikan muuttamisesta 1069/1991
Laki ulkomaalaisten asuminen 404/1994
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1989_35
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court dismissal, ruling that a new shareholder can challenge a prior unanimous resolution requiring all owners' consent.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:26
Supreme Court dismisses challenge to apartment co-op share increase as valid share issuance under Act. Court rules share count increase constitutes issuance. Court rejects procedural defect argument regarding share issuance. Court finds share issuance valid under Act provisions. Court dismisses objection based on lack of specific details. Court upholds share issuance despite missing information. Court concludes share issuance was legally effective. Court rejects challenge to share issuance validity. Court affirms share issuance under Act requirements.
kko-precedent_1988_3
Supreme Court dismisses shareholder suit claiming mandatory repair costs violate company law and create unjust enrichment.
kko-precedent_1991_46
Shareholder meeting resolution invalid for granting disproportionate benefit to majority shareholders at minority expense.
appeal_1984_turku__873
Company meeting decision voided because invitation was sent via door post instead of registered mail as required by articles of association.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys jatkokäsittelyluvan myöntämisen edellytyksistä asunto-osakeyhtiön yhtiökokouksen päätöksen moitetta ynnä muuta koskevassa asiassa.