Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 859/2019 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal against appellate court's expanded conviction and increased damages without plaintiff's request.

Numero d'incarto KKO 859/2019
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the prosecution's appeal against the District Court's judgment, overturning the High Court's decision to expand the conviction and increase damages. Although the plaintiff did not request a change to the District Court's ruling, the High Court had independently broadened the conviction and raised the compensation amount. The Supreme Court determined that the High Court's actions were legally flawed and restored the original compensation level.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 33 of the Code of Judicial Procedure; Section 34 of the Code of Judicial Procedure: An appellate court may not expand the conviction or increase damages without the party's request, and such unauthorized changes must be corrected on appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
appellate procedure unauthorized conviction expansion damages adjustment plaintiff consent judicial review diritto a una copertura assicurativa più estesa modificazione delle conclusioni rettificazione della decisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 33 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Section 34 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2006_720
Supreme Court dismissed client's claim for increased damages due to changed trial circumstances without prior appeal.
kko-precedent_2008_97
Supreme Court allowed appeal on damages increase after remanding case for retrial, rejecting defendant's reformatio in peius argument.
kko-precedent_2013_71
Supreme Court allows partial criminal dismissal but upholds full civil compensation due to defendant's admission of liability amounts.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-precedent_2013_30
Supreme Court allows appeal for insufficient damages reasoning due to lack of trial court justification.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Syyttäjän haettua muutosta käräjäoikeuden tuomioon hovioikeus oli laajentanut syyksilukemista. Hovioikeus oli tämän johdosta myös korottanut asianomistajalle tuomittua vahingonkorvausta, vaikka asianomistaja ei ollut hakenut muutosta käräjäoikeuden tuomioon. Hovioikeuden tuomitsema vahingonkorvaus alennettiin käräjäoikeuden tuomitsemaan määrään.