Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 681/2019 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows witness statement as evidence in serious drug offense trial despite procedural objections.

Numero d'incarto KKO 681/2019
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the witness statement to be considered as evidence in a serious drug offense trial. The prosecution submitted the statement, while the defense argued it should be excluded due to procedural irregularities. The court ruled that the statement met the requirements for admissibility and could be used to establish facts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Korkein oikeus 1. luvun 10 a § syyteprosessilain (1999) ja 1. luvun 10 § syyteprosessilain (1999): A witness statement submitted by the prosecution may be admitted as evidence in a criminal trial if it satisfies the statutory requirements for admissibility and does not violate the defendant's rights.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
witness statement admissibility serious drug offense procedural irregularities evidence rules Finland criminal trial procedure obbligo di comparizione all'udienza difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico principio di pubblicità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
1. luvun 10 a § syyteprosessilain (1999)
1. luvun 10 § syyteprosessilain (1999)

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO 2018:54
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, remands case for retrial due to failure to hear victim in criminal trial.
Generato dall'IA
kko-leave_2025_33
Supreme Court held that the leave-to-appeal certificate description does not bind the court or limit case handling.
kko-precedent_2015_20
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court uses prior investigation statement as evidence without giving defendant a chance to comment.
kko-other_2002_189
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; oral hearing required when facts are disputed and no prior hearing occurred.
kko-precedent_1991_84
Supreme Court dismisses drug charge evidence due to defendant's right to cross-examine witnesses violation.
kko-other_2013_1023
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditions for granting further proceedings permission in assault cases.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, onko kanssavastaajan esitutkintakertomus voitu hovioikeudessa ottaa näyttönä huomioon ratkaistaessa törkeää huumausainerikosta koskevaa asiaa. Ks. KKO:2018:54