Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 638/2019 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court wrongly denied further proceedings permission due to factual error.

Numero d'incarto KKO 638/2019
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision to deny permission for further proceedings. The lower court incorrectly concluded that the applicant required such permission, a determination based on a factual error regarding the case status. Consequently, the Supreme Court ordered the case to be returned to the Court of Appeal for a correct assessment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki oikeudenkäyntijärjestystä koskevista yleisistä säännöistä (1093/1999) 10 §; Laki oikeudenkäyntijärjestystä koskevista yleisistä säännöistä (1093/1999) 11 §: The Court of Appeal's refusal to grant permission for further proceedings is invalid if the refusal was based on a mistaken finding that the applicant required such permission.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
permission for further proceedings Court of Appeal error factual mistake in procedure Supreme Court review case remittal vizio di procedura principio del ne bis in idem audizione delle parti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
1093/1999 10 §
1093/1999 11 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2009_29
Supreme Court remands case due to appellate court's failure to request written response on appeal, violating procedural fairness.
kko-other_2008_65
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding High Court's duty to transfer serious theft cases to main court.
kko-precedent_2008_59
Supreme Court quashes appeal court decision for violating oral testimony rules by relying on written statements.
kko-precedent_1993_149
Supreme Court remands case to ensure non-responding party received notice of new appeal deadline.
kko-other_1999_1823
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding payment made after lower court judgment to be considered in final ruling.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Hovioikeus oli virheellisesti katsonut valittajan tarvitsevan asiassa jatkokäsittelyluvan ja jättänyt luvan myöntämättä. Asia palautettiin hovioikeuteen.