Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 330/2019 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal as insurance court composition was illegal for military accident case.

Numero d'incarto KKO 330/2019
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal against the insurance court's decision to reject a military accident claim. The court found the insurance court's composition illegal because it lacked a military law expert required for such cases. Consequently, the matter was remitted to the insurance court for retrial with a properly constituted panel.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Insurance Act 1993; Military Accident Act 1993: An insurance court must include a military law expert when adjudicating military accident cases, and a decision rendered by an improperly constituted court is void and must be remitted.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
military accident claim insurance court composition legal expert requirement void court decision remittal procedure Supreme Court review statutory compliance riapertura della pratica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Insurance Act 1993
Military Accident Act 1993
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2018_2055
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when insurance court composition is illegal for military accident cases.
kko-other_2013_526
Supreme Court dismisses appeal to insurance court when medical reports were unavailable due to insurer's error.
kko-other_2007_843
Insurance appeal dismissed because insurer failed to address new claim raised in the appeal decision.
insurance_1984_4173-1983
Insurance court dismissed appeal for lack of hearing rights; applicant denied chance to comment on insurer's submissions.
kko-precedent_2004_55
Supreme Court allows removal of insurance court decisions due to failure to inform claimant of insurer's response.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Korkein oikeus katsoi, ettei vakuutusoikeuden kokoonpano sen käsitellessä sotilastapaturma-asiaa ollut laillinen, ja palautti asian vakuutusoikeuteen laillisessa kokoonpanossa käsiteltäväksi.