Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO 1618/2019 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows community service as supplementary sentence for conditional imprisonment under lighter interpretation of law.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1618/2019
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the imposition of community service as a supplementary sentence to a conditional imprisonment of less than one year. The defendant was sentenced to eight months of conditional imprisonment and thirty hours of community service, despite the law generally requiring a year-long conditional sentence for such supplementary penalties. The court applied a lighter interpretation of the law, ruling that the specific circumstances justified this deviation from the standard requirement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 3 of the Punishment Act; Section 4 of the Punishment Act: The Supreme Court held that a lighter interpretation of the law permits community service as a supplementary sentence to conditional imprisonment even when the term is under one year.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conditional imprisonment supplementary sentence community service lighter interpretation Punishment Act Supreme Court sentencing guidelines diritto a condizioni minime d'esistenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 3 of the Punishment Act
Section 4 of the Punishment Act

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Vastaaja oli tuomittu yhteiseen 8 kuukauden ehdolliseen vankeusrangaistukseen ja sen ohella 30 tunnin yhdyskuntapalveluun. Yksi vastaajan syyksi luetuista rikoksista oli tehty aikana, jolloin yhdyskuntapalvelun tuomitseminen oheisrangaistuksena edellytti, että tuomittu ehdollinen rangaistus oli vuotta pidempi. Korkein oikeus katsoi lievemmän lain periaate huomioon ottaen, että vastaajalle voitiin tuomita ehdollisen vankeuden oheisseuraamuksena yhdyskuntapalvelua. Ks. KKO:2003:134