Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1283/2019 Generato dall'IA

Employee's claim against employer for legal costs in labor dispute was allowed with partial cost reimbursement.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1283/2019
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the employee's claim for legal costs against the employer regarding a labor dispute. The case was procedurally unclear under the Code of Judicial Procedure, yet the employer had a justified reason to participate in the proceedings. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer must partially reimburse the employee's legal expenses despite the procedural ambiguity.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Code of Judicial Procedure Chapter 21 Section 8a; When a labor dispute case is legally unclear under the Code of Judicial Procedure, the employer must partially reimburse the employee's legal costs if they had a justified reason to participate in the proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
labor dispute legal costs employee claim employer liability procedural clarity Supreme Court cost reimbursement diritto al salario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Code of Judicial Procedure Chapter 21 Section 8a
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2019_1284
Supreme Court allows employee's claim against employer for legal costs due to procedural uncertainty.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:65
Supreme Court allows employee's claim against employer for legal costs where case was legally unclear.
kko-precedent_1998_118
Supreme Court dismisses state's liability for litigation costs when plaintiff sues only state for costs, not main claim.
kko-other_1998_3216
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; state not liable for litigation costs in wage protection case.
labour_1975_69
Employer must pay severance if dismissal lacks valid economic grounds, even if employee misconduct contributed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Työntekijän työnantajaansa vastaan ajama työsuhdesaatavia koskeva kanne oli hyväksytty. Asia oli oikeudenkäymiskaaren 21 luvun 8 a §:ssä tarkoitetulla tavalla oikeudellisesti niin epäselvä, että työnantajalla oli ollut perusteltu syy oikeudenkäyntiin. Korkein oikeus katsoi ratkaisustaan ilmenevillä perusteilla, että työnantajan tuli kuitenkin korvata työntekijän oikeudenkäyntikulut osittain.

OK 21 luku 8 a §