Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 944/2018 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows retrial when lower court wrongly denies it based on insufficient evidence of participation in crime.

Numero d'incarto KKO 944/2018
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted a retrial order because the Court of Appeal incorrectly refused the defendant's request for continued proceedings. The lower court denied the request despite evidence suggesting the defendant participated in the alleged serious theft during investigation and court proceedings. The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal failed to properly apply the legal standard for granting retrials under the relevant criminal procedure code.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta; OK 25 a luku 11 § 2 mom: A court must grant a retrial if the original decision was based on a failure to properly assess evidence regarding the defendant's participation in the alleged crime.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal procedure retrial participation in crime evidence assessment standard Court of Appeal error serious theft proceedings motivi di rigore vizio di procedura errore giudiziario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta
OK 25 a luku 11 § 2 mom
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2013_39
Supreme Court grants retrial permission for new evidence challenging lower court's evidence assessment in assault case.
kko-precedent_2007_10
Supreme Court quashes appeal court verdict for failing to hear victim personally in criminal trial.
appeal_1983_helsinki__1608
Court of Appeal may add qualifying circumstances to a convicted person's decision based solely on their appeal if evidence supports it.
kko-precedent_2018_62
Supreme Court allows retrial when lower court dismisses appeal without verifying if defense arguments actually affect the case outcome.
kko-precedent_2013_62
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court ignores mitigating sentence without explanation, effectively remaking trial reasoning.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli katsonut vastaajan osallistuneen tekijänä syytteen mukaiseen törkeään varkauteen vastaajan esitutkinnassa ja käräjäoikeudessa antaman kertomuksen, televalvontatietojen sekä muun asiassa esitetyn selvityksen perusteella. Hovioikeus ei myöntänyt vastaajalle jatkokäsittelylupaa. Korkeimman oikeuden päätöksestä ilmenevillä perusteilla katsottiin, että hovioikeuden olisi tullut myöntää jatkokäsittelylupa muutosperusteella.

OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta

OK 25 a luku 11 § 2 mom