Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1725/2018 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows retrial for child sexual abuse case due to insufficient evidence assessment by lower court.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1725/2018
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted a retrial to the defendant, A, who was convicted of child sexual abuse based primarily on the victim's testimony. A argued that the lower court failed to provide sufficient evidence of his guilt, while the Court of Appeal denied further proceedings. The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal erred in its evidence assessment and must grant a retrial under the specified legal provision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta; OK 25 a luku 11 § 2 mom: If the Court of Appeal fails to provide sufficient reasons for rejecting a retrial request based on new evidence or procedural errors, the Supreme Court must grant the retrial.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
child sexual abuse insufficient evidence retrial application Court of Appeal error Supreme Court review audizione di un genitore sospensione del diritto di visita atto sessuale con un fanciullo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta
OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta
OK 25 a luku 11 § 2 mom
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2017_19
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; main hearing required for credibility assessment of conflicting testimonies in criminal case.
kko-other_2022_1018
Supreme Court allows continued proceedings for sexual abuse case where initial application was rejected due to procedural errors.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:54
Supreme Court dismisses sexual abuse charge due to reasonable doubt regarding victim's memory reliability after 10 years.
kko-leave_2026_10
Supreme Court allows appeal on jurisdiction; lower court wrongly dismissed charge due to lack of aggravated circumstances.
kko-precedent_2006_40
Supreme Court dismisses screening request for child abuse case due to lack of established precedent for new technology-based offenses.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli tuominnut A:n lapsen seksuaalisesta hyväksikäytöstä 5 kuukauden ehdolliseen vankeusrangaistukseen. Näyttö perustui keskeisesti asianomistajan esitutkinnassa antamaan kertomukseen. A oli yksilöidysti näytön arvioinnin riitauttaen kiistänyt syytteen, koska asiassa ei ollut esitetty riittävää näyttöä hänen syyllisyydestään. Hovioikeus ei ollut myöntänyt A:lle jatkokäsittelylupaa.

Korkeimman oikeuden päätöksestä ilmenevillä perusteilla katsottiin, että hovioikeuden olisi tullut myöntää jatkokäsittelylupa muutosperusteella.

OK 25 a luku 11 § 1 mom 1 kohta

OK 25 a luku 11 § 2 mom