Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1319/2018 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows further proceedings in damages claim against defendant where lower court dismissed due to unclear facts.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1319/2018
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted leave for further proceedings after the Court of Appeal rejected the plaintiff's damages claim against the defendant. The lower courts dismissed the case because the facts regarding the damage and liability remained unclear. The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal erred in denying further examination based on these unresolved factual issues.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

OK 25 a luku 11 §; The Supreme Court established that a Court of Appeal must grant leave for further proceedings when the lower court's dismissal of a damages claim rests on unresolved factual uncertainties rather than clear legal grounds.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
further proceedings leave damages claim dismissal factual uncertainty Court of Appeal error civil procedure rights vizio formale diritto a una copertura assicurativa più estesa vizio di procedura

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
OK 25 a luku 11 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2013_44
Supreme Court allows appeal on costs in family case without further handling permission as it falls under application proceedings.
kko-precedent_2013_62
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court ignores mitigating sentence without explanation, effectively remaking trial reasoning.
kko-other_2005_602
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding screening procedure requirements for theft cases under Finnish law.
kko-other_2002_2150
Supreme Court held lower court must provide compensation in main proceedings when damages are contested.
kko-precedent_2013_14
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when High Court wrongly denies retrial while altering lower court's reasoning.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Asianomistaja B oli rikosasian käsittelyn yhteydessä esittänyt vahingonkorvausvaatimuksen vastaaja A:ta kohtaan. Käräjäoikeus oli katsonut, että asia oli jäänyt epäselväksi ja hylännyt kaikki vaatimukset. Hovioikeus ei ollut myöntänyt B:lle jatkokäsittelylupaa.

Korkeimman oikeuden päätöksestä ilmenevillä perusteilla katsottiin, että hovioikeuden olisi tullut myöntää jatkokäsittelylupa tarkistusperusteella.

OK 25 a luku 11 §