Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 769/2016 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows surrender refusal based on EU law discretionary grounds regarding child's best interests.

Numero d'incarto KKO 769/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the applicant's request to refuse surrender to a third country. The lower court had found a discretionary ground for refusal under EU law concerning the child's best interests. The court upheld this decision, confirming that such grounds constitute valid reasons to deny extradition under the relevant EU framework.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 17(1) of the Return Directive; Art. 2(1) of the Return Directive: The court established that discretionary grounds for refusal based on the best interests of the child constitute a valid basis for denying surrender under EU law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
EU Return Directive discretionary refusal grounds child best interests surrender refusal third country expulsion grave deficienza del procedimento all'estero ricorso costituzionale all'estero oltraggio a uno Stato estero

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 17(1) of the Return Directive
Art. 2(1) of the Return Directive
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2020_1471
Supreme Court allows transfer to Sweden but rejects condition of returning to Finland for sentence execution.
kko-precedent_1997_149
Supreme Court allows prosecution for pre-extradition crimes when extradition is for sentence execution under Nordic law.
kko-precedent_2010_59
Supreme Court allows secondary charge of fraud in extradition case where primary charge was insufficiently prepared. The court ruled that the secondary charge of fraud was admissible despite the extradition order covering all crimes, as the primary charge did not adequately prepare the defense for the secondary allegations. The decision clarifies that a secondary charge can be examined even if the extradition request covered all crimes, provided the defense was not prejudiced by the initial charge's scope. The court held that the secondary charge was admissible because the primary charge did not sufficiently prepare the defense for the secondary allegations, despite the extradition order covering all crimes. The court decided that the secondary charge was admissible because the primary charge did not sufficiently prepare the defense for the secondary allegations, despite the extradition order covering all crimes. The court decided that the secondary charge was admissible because the primary charge did not sufficiently prepare the defense for the secondary allegations, despite the extradition order covering all crimes.
kko-precedent_2012_87
Supreme Court of Finland allows temporary extradition to Sweden pending pending Finnish trial completion.
kko-precedent_2014_29
Supreme Court allows detention of Swedish citizen for organizing illegal entry based on flight risk despite residence abroad.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli katsonut, että luovuttamiselle oli EU-luovuttamislain 6 §:n 8 kohdan mukainen harkinnanvarainen kieltäytymisperuste. Kysymys luovuttamisen edellytyksistä.