Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2356/2014 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court held that prior final boundary decisions bind new boundary proceedings unless explicitly overridden by subsequent valid rulings.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2356/2014
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court ruled that a previously final boundary decision remains binding in new boundary proceedings unless explicitly superseded by subsequent valid rulings. The case involved a boundary post constructed off the established line and a subsequent water reclamation proceeding that did not formally traverse the existing boundary. The court determined that the new proceedings could not ignore the prior final decision without a specific legal basis to override it.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

KML 104 § 1 mom; The principle of legal certainty requires that final boundary decisions remain binding in subsequent proceedings unless explicitly and legally overridden by later valid determinations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
boundary determination legal certainty final decision subsequent proceedings property rights boundary post supreme court introduzione di nuove restrizioni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
KML 104 § 1 mom
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2017_53
Supreme Court dismisses tidal marsh acquisition claim due to minor harm compared to natural landscape preservation goals.
kko-precedent_1989_67
Supreme Court ruled that the 'small bay' rule applies to bays bordering open sea, overriding the low-water mark principle.
kko-precedent_1991_69
Supreme Court quashes survey dismissal for failing to conduct boundary survey during formal proceeding after prior boundary setting.
kko-other_1999_505
Supreme Court allows transferring a watercourse by purchase and sale instead of area exchange under Land Act.
kko-precedent_1990_144
Supreme Court holds violation of water law permit conditions is punishable regardless of actual environmental damage.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kahden tilan välinen piiriraja oli aikanaan käyty lainvoimaisesti. Myöhemmässä vesijätön lunastustoimituksessa yksi rajapyykki oli rakennettu rajankäynnissä määritellystä rajasta poikkeavaan paikkaan ja vesijättöä oli lunastettu piirirajaa kuitenkaan käymättä. Myös toisessa vesijätön lunastustoimituksessa vesijättöä oli lunastettu tähän rajapyykkiin saakka. Kysymys siitä, mikä merkitys vesijätön lunastustoimituksissa tehdyillä ratkaisuilla oli määrättäessä uudessa rajankäyntitoimituksessa tilojen välistä rajaa.

KML 104 § 1 mom