Supreme Court dismissed appeal where land court increased compensation for crop patterns not claimed in the original complaint.

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal against a land court decision that increased compensation for specific crop patterns not explicitly claimed by the appellant. The appellant argued that the land court exceeded its authority by addressing issues outside the scope of the original complaint regarding land restitution compensation. The court ruled that the land court was correct to consider all relevant facts to determine the total value of the land, even if the appellant did not specifically request compensation for every individual crop pattern.